Comments on: Whippey v Jones – dog walker not liable for personal injury http://injurymediation.co.uk/2009/06/whippey-v-jones-dog-walker-not-liable-for-personal-injury/ Dispute resolution for personal injury professionals Mon, 31 Jan 2011 11:56:04 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: ANGELA WARD http://injurymediation.co.uk/2009/06/whippey-v-jones-dog-walker-not-liable-for-personal-injury/comment-page-1/#comment-326 ANGELA WARD Tue, 18 Jan 2011 18:10:07 +0000 http://injurymediation.co.uk/?p=578#comment-326 I AM A CASUALTY OF A DOG INCIDENT THAT HAPPENED ON 18TH JUNE 2009.. FROM THE RESULT OF A (BITCH) DOBERMAN DOG WEIGHING 6 HALF STONE, RUNNING FULL PELT INTO MY LEFT KNEE, RESULTING IN THE FOLLOWING INJURIES: CONCUSSION WHIPLASH BROKEN LEFT WRIST IN 2 PLACES, WHICH HAD TO BE PINNED. MAJOR SPINAL SURGERY, INCORPERATING REMOVAL OF ONE LOWER DISC, ONE DISCOTOMY, 2 METAL PLATES, 4 METAL BOLTS, AND 2 METAL RODS. AM BEING REFERRED TO A KNEE SPECIALIST TO SEE IF I NEED SURGERY FROM WHERE THE DOG IMPACTED. I SPENT A TOTAL OF 8 MONTHS IN A WHEELCHAIR, 6 MONTHS PREVIOUS TO SPINAL OP. I AM HAVEING LEGAL ADVICE, BUT MY LEGAL TEAM HAVE INFORMED ME THAT DUE TO MR WHIPPEY V JONES CASE THE OWNER OF THE DOBERMAN WOULD PROBABLY HAVE NO CASE TO ANSWER, AS HE IS NOT NEGLIGENT IN HIS DOGS BEHAVIOR CONTARIARY TO THE SIX WITNESS STATEMENTS WE HAVE SAYING THAT HE HAS NO CONTROL OVER HIS DOG. I FEEL MY CASE IS NOT COMPATIBLE WITH THIS CASE IN ANY WAY, AS THE OWNER HAD TOTAL UNBLOCKED VISION OF HIS DOG. I STRONGLY FEEL THAT THE 1971 DOGS ACT SHOULD BE COMPLETELY REVIEWED AND BROUGHT UP TO DATE. CONTACT MARK 07786583579. I AM A CASUALTY OF A DOG INCIDENT THAT HAPPENED ON 18TH JUNE 2009.. FROM THE RESULT OF A (BITCH) DOBERMAN DOG WEIGHING 6 HALF STONE, RUNNING FULL PELT INTO MY LEFT KNEE, RESULTING IN THE FOLLOWING INJURIES:

CONCUSSION
WHIPLASH
BROKEN LEFT WRIST IN 2 PLACES, WHICH HAD TO BE PINNED.
MAJOR SPINAL SURGERY, INCORPERATING REMOVAL OF ONE LOWER DISC, ONE DISCOTOMY, 2 METAL PLATES, 4 METAL BOLTS, AND 2 METAL RODS.
AM BEING REFERRED TO A KNEE SPECIALIST TO SEE IF I NEED SURGERY FROM WHERE THE DOG IMPACTED.
I SPENT A TOTAL OF 8 MONTHS IN A WHEELCHAIR, 6 MONTHS PREVIOUS TO SPINAL OP.

I AM HAVEING LEGAL ADVICE, BUT MY LEGAL TEAM HAVE INFORMED ME THAT DUE TO MR WHIPPEY V JONES CASE THE OWNER OF THE DOBERMAN WOULD PROBABLY HAVE NO CASE TO ANSWER, AS HE IS NOT NEGLIGENT IN HIS DOGS BEHAVIOR CONTARIARY TO THE SIX WITNESS STATEMENTS WE HAVE SAYING THAT HE HAS NO CONTROL OVER HIS DOG.
I FEEL MY CASE IS NOT COMPATIBLE WITH THIS CASE IN ANY WAY, AS THE OWNER HAD TOTAL UNBLOCKED VISION OF HIS DOG.
I STRONGLY FEEL THAT THE 1971 DOGS ACT SHOULD BE COMPLETELY REVIEWED AND BROUGHT UP TO DATE.
CONTACT MARK 07786583579.

]]>