<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Personal Injury Mediation ServicesQuantum | Personal Injury Mediation Services</title>
	<atom:link href="http://injurymediation.co.uk/category/quantum/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://injurymediation.co.uk</link>
	<description>Dispute resolution for personal injury professionals</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2011 09:05:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Fatal Accidents Act bereavement damages &#8211; still an insult?</title>
		<link>http://injurymediation.co.uk/2009/07/fatal-accidents-act-bereavement-damages/</link>
		<comments>http://injurymediation.co.uk/2009/07/fatal-accidents-act-bereavement-damages/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 12:32:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Phil Hesketh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Quantum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fatal accidents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://injurymediation.co.uk/?p=692</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Ministry of Justice has just published its response to the consultation paper ‘The Law on Damages’ which was originally published on 4 May 2007. The Law Society Gazette quotes APIL president John McQuater as saying The government hasn’t understood that the current level of bereavement damages is seen as an insult by many people....]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://injurymediation.co.uk/2009/07/fatal-accidents-act-bereavement-damages/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Copley v Lawn and Maden v Haller &#8211; car hire spot rates still recoverable</title>
		<link>http://injurymediation.co.uk/2009/06/copley-v-lawn-maden-v-haller/</link>
		<comments>http://injurymediation.co.uk/2009/06/copley-v-lawn-maden-v-haller/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 08:07:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Phil Hesketh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Quantum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[car hire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spot rates]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://injurymediation.co.uk/?p=641</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Insurers must cease the practice of cold calling the victims of accidents caused by one of their insured drivers. This is the view of Longmore LJ in the recent credit hire ruling in Copley v Lawn and Maden v Haller which were heard together in the Court of Appeal. Keep in touch with mediation news....]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://injurymediation.co.uk/2009/06/copley-v-lawn-maden-v-haller/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

